146 research outputs found
Natural Language Generation enhances human decision-making with uncertain information
Decision-making is often dependent on uncertain data, e.g. data associated
with confidence scores or probabilities. We present a comparison of different
information presentations for uncertain data and, for the first time, measure
their effects on human decision-making. We show that the use of Natural
Language Generation (NLG) improves decision-making under uncertainty, compared
to state-of-the-art graphical-based representation methods. In a task-based
study with 442 adults, we found that presentations using NLG lead to 24% better
decision-making on average than the graphical presentations, and to 44% better
decision-making when NLG is combined with graphics. We also show that women
achieve significantly better results when presented with NLG output (an 87%
increase on average compared to graphical presentations).Comment: 54th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(ACL), Berlin 201
RankME: Reliable Human Ratings for Natural Language Generation
Human evaluation for natural language generation (NLG) often suffers from
inconsistent user ratings. While previous research tends to attribute this
problem to individual user preferences, we show that the quality of human
judgements can also be improved by experimental design. We present a novel
rank-based magnitude estimation method (RankME), which combines the use of
continuous scales and relative assessments. We show that RankME significantly
improves the reliability and consistency of human ratings compared to
traditional evaluation methods. In addition, we show that it is possible to
evaluate NLG systems according to multiple, distinct criteria, which is
important for error analysis. Finally, we demonstrate that RankME, in
combination with Bayesian estimation of system quality, is a cost-effective
alternative for ranking multiple NLG systems.Comment: Accepted to NAACL 2018 (The 2018 Conference of the North American
Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Referenceless Quality Estimation for Natural Language Generation
Traditional automatic evaluation measures for natural language generation
(NLG) use costly human-authored references to estimate the quality of a system
output. In this paper, we propose a referenceless quality estimation (QE)
approach based on recurrent neural networks, which predicts a quality score for
a NLG system output by comparing it to the source meaning representation only.
Our method outperforms traditional metrics and a constant baseline in most
respects; we also show that synthetic data helps to increase correlation
results by 21% compared to the base system. Our results are comparable to
results obtained in similar QE tasks despite the more challenging setting.Comment: Accepted as a regular paper to 1st Workshop on Learning to Generate
Natural Language (LGNL), Sydney, 10 August 201
Findings of the E2E NLG Challenge
This paper summarises the experimental setup and results of the first shared
task on end-to-end (E2E) natural language generation (NLG) in spoken dialogue
systems. Recent end-to-end generation systems are promising since they reduce
the need for data annotation. However, they are currently limited to small,
delexicalised datasets. The E2E NLG shared task aims to assess whether these
novel approaches can generate better-quality output by learning from a dataset
containing higher lexical richness, syntactic complexity and diverse discourse
phenomena. We compare 62 systems submitted by 17 institutions, covering a wide
range of approaches, including machine learning architectures -- with the
majority implementing sequence-to-sequence models (seq2seq) -- as well as
systems based on grammatical rules and templates.Comment: Accepted to INLG 201
Data-driven Natural Language Generation: Paving the Road to Success
We argue that there are currently two major bottlenecks to the commercial use
of statistical machine learning approaches for natural language generation
(NLG): (a) The lack of reliable automatic evaluation metrics for NLG, and (b)
The scarcity of high quality in-domain corpora. We address the first problem by
thoroughly analysing current evaluation metrics and motivating the need for a
new, more reliable metric. The second problem is addressed by presenting a
novel framework for developing and evaluating a high quality corpus for NLG
training.Comment: WiNLP workshop at ACL 201
Crowd-sourcing NLG Data: Pictures Elicit Better Data
Recent advances in corpus-based Natural Language Generation (NLG) hold the
promise of being easily portable across domains, but require costly training
data, consisting of meaning representations (MRs) paired with Natural Language
(NL) utterances. In this work, we propose a novel framework for crowdsourcing
high quality NLG training data, using automatic quality control measures and
evaluating different MRs with which to elicit data. We show that pictorial MRs
result in better NL data being collected than logic-based MRs: utterances
elicited by pictorial MRs are judged as significantly more natural, more
informative, and better phrased, with a significant increase in average quality
ratings (around 0.5 points on a 6-point scale), compared to using the logical
MRs. As the MR becomes more complex, the benefits of pictorial stimuli
increase. The collected data will be released as part of this submission.Comment: The 9th International Natural Language Generation conference INLG,
2016. 10 pages, 2 figures, 3 table
The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generation
This paper describes the E2E data, a new dataset for training end-to-end,
data-driven natural language generation systems in the restaurant domain, which
is ten times bigger than existing, frequently used datasets in this area. The
E2E dataset poses new challenges: (1) its human reference texts show more
lexical richness and syntactic variation, including discourse phenomena; (2)
generating from this set requires content selection. As such, learning from
this dataset promises more natural, varied and less template-like system
utterances. We also establish a baseline on this dataset, which illustrates
some of the difficulties associated with this data.Comment: Accepted as a short paper for SIGDIAL 2017 (final submission
including supplementary material
A Review of Evaluation Techniques for Social Dialogue Systems
In contrast with goal-oriented dialogue, social dialogue has no clear measure
of task success. Consequently, evaluation of these systems is notoriously hard.
In this paper, we review current evaluation methods, focusing on automatic
metrics. We conclude that turn-based metrics often ignore the context and do
not account for the fact that several replies are valid, while end-of-dialogue
rewards are mainly hand-crafted. Both lack grounding in human perceptions.Comment: 2 page
Better Conversations by Modeling,Filtering,and Optimizing for Coherence and Diversity
We present three enhancements to existing encoder-decoder models for
open-domain conversational agents, aimed at effectively modeling coherence and
promoting output diversity: (1) We introduce a measure of coherence as the
GloVe embedding similarity between the dialogue context and the generated
response, (2) we filter our training corpora based on the measure of coherence
to obtain topically coherent and lexically diverse context-response pairs, (3)
we then train a response generator using a conditional variational autoencoder
model that incorporates the measure of coherence as a latent variable and uses
a context gate to guarantee topical consistency with the context and promote
lexical diversity. Experiments on the OpenSubtitles corpus show a substantial
improvement over competitive neural models in terms of BLEU score as well as
metrics of coherence and diversity
- …